SUGGESTED LETTER TO STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS CONCERNING SOUND WALLS AND ASPHALT ROADWAYS FOR THE ROUTE 202 CONSTRUCTION
TO: ______________________________________date_______________________
FROM: ____________________________________address_____________________
Re: Route 202 Section 300 Noise Abatement
Dear
_____________________________________________________________________
Route 202 Section 300* in Chester County is being widened to accommodate the
intense development of this part of Pennsylvania. While I support this
project I believe that the quality of life of the residents that live along
this highway is of equal if not overriding importance. PennDOT anticipates
that there will be a 65% increase in traffic on this highway within the next
five years.
Noise abatement is critical. After conducting an ambient noise study, which
showed a noise level in excess of the 67 decibels required for sound walls,
our civic association, the Great Valley Association, favors the installation
of sound walls and an asphalt road surface for adequate noise abatement. I
support this view and believe that the many residential communities affected
by this project also deserve nothing less.
Present day asphalt is smoother than concrete and therefore has better noise
attenuating properties. In fact, on average, asphalt has at least a 3
decibel advantage over concrete in noise reduction, at a minimum. A
three-decibel increase in noise amounts to a doubling of the noise level
created by traffic on a high-speed road such as Route 202. This is VERY
significant statistic is probably one of the reasons why 64% of the
interstate highways in our country are paved with asphalt. Asphalt is also
less expensive to install and to maintain.
It's noteworthy that Section 400 of this project is paved with concrete and
despite assurances that present technology has made concrete less noisy this
is not in evidence and Section 400 is unimpressive in this respect.
We look forward to your favorable support of our noise abatement proposals
for Section 300, which is 80% federally funded and 20% state funded. We
know that you will agree that the growth, which necessitates this expansion,
should not also be the reason for the demise of the residential communities
that surround it.
Thank you.